Legal Opinion

Peabody Energy Corp., Peabody Coal Co., LLC, and Black Beauty Coal Co. v. Richard F. Roark and Beelman Truck Co., and North American Capacity Ins. Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 2012No. 14A01-1112-CT-555PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

BARNES, Judge.

North American Capacity Insurance Company (“NAC”) petitions for rehearing following our opinion in Peabody Energy Corp. v. Roark, 973 N.E.2d 636 (Ind.Ct.App.2012). We grant NAC’s petition for rehearing; however, we affirm our opinion in all regards.

In our original opinion, we were asked to determine whether Peabody Energy Corporation, Peabody Coal Company, LLC, and Black Beauty Coal Company (collectively, “Peabody”) were additional insureds under an insurance policy (“the Policy”) issued by NAC to Beelman Truck Company (“Beelman”). After considering the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peabody Energy Corp. v. RoarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Carey v. HaddockIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Darliss Wert and Gary Wert v. Meridian Security Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Selective Insurance Co. of South Carolina v. Erie Insurance ExchangeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. JakubowiczIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina and 500 Rangeline Road, LLC v. Erie Insurace Exchange, Welch & Wilson Properties, LLC d/b/a Hammons Storage, Allianz Global Risks U.S. Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Carol Jakubowicz, Individually, and as Parent and Legal Guardian of Jacob Jakubowicz and Joseph Jakubowicz, MinorsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API