Legal Opinion
Carey v. Haddock
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 11, 2007No. 20A03-0611-CV-556PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Russell N. Carey (“Russell”) and Lisa Carey (“Lisa”) (collectively, “the Careys”) bring this appeal after they received a favorable verdict on their complaint against Susan J. Haddock following a jury trial. The Careys raise three issues for our review, but we address only the following dispositive issue: whether the Careys’ appeal is moot because they have accepted Haddock’s payment in satisfaction of the judgment.
We dismiss.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 7, 2002, the Careys were in an automobile accident with Haddock. As a result of that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zimmerman v. GaumerIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Klippel v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Schwedland v. BachmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Kennedy v. EderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- RJH of Florida, Inc. v. Summit Account and Computer Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jose Arcia De La Cruz v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Carey v. HaddockIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008