Prairie State National Bank v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
On both parties’ Appeal.
The Secretary of the Treasury refers conflicting claims upon a fund in the Treasury. There is no controversy on the part of the Government, the questions involved relating simply to the distribution of the fund. It consists of two elements; of the 10 per cent reserved *615from monthly payments due to the contractor; of the 10 per cent reserved frommonthly payments due to the surety, who completed the building after the contractor had failed. The surety seeks to recover both; the adverse claimant, a hank, seeks to recover the former, under an arrangement between it and the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- John T. Callahan & Sons, Inc. v. Dykeman Electric Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- In Re Jones Construction & Renovation, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Home Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.