Legal Opinion

Prairie State National Bank v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided July 1, 1896PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On both parties’ Appeal.

The Secretary of the Treasury refers conflicting claims upon a fund in the Treasury. There is no controversy on the part of the Government, the questions involved relating simply to the distribution of the fund. It consists of two elements; of the 10 per cent reserved *615from monthly payments due to the contractor; of the 10 per cent reserved frommonthly payments due to the surety, who completed the building after the contractor had failed. The surety seeks to recover both; the adverse claimant, a hank, seeks to recover the former, under an arrangement between it and the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. John T. Callahan & Sons, Inc. v. Dykeman Electric Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
  3. In Re Jones Construction & Renovation, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  4. Home Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API