Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 12, 1940No. 44293PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhaley, Chief Justice

This is a suit by the surety of a prime contractor to recover the retained percentages earned by the contractor during its performance of the work and before the work was taken over by the surety and completed after default on the part of the prime contractor.

The facts show that on November 19,1932, the Construction Materials Corporation entered into a contract with the United States to furnish all labor and materials and perform all work required for the deepening of Ballards Eeef Channel, Detroit River, and for the construction of a compensating dike by the use of ledge rock removed from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Prairie State National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Universal Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  2. Schmoll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  4. Munsey Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  5. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API