In Re the Estate of Warner
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County settling the final account of the executor of the will of a deceased person. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
It is agreed by counsel on both sides that but one point need be considered on this appeal, i. e., whether the realty of the deceased in this state was his separate property or was community property.
The matter comes here on appeal from a judgment sustaining contestant’s objection to the executor’s proposed final account and settling that account in accordance with the theory that the land was community property.
John W. Warner and the contestant were married in 1874 and resided in Clinton, Illinois, until his death. During their married life John W. Warner sent from Illinois certain funds…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Estate of NiccollsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Kraemer v. KraemerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Dimmick v. DimmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Rowe v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Jordan v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kuchel v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Estate of ArmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re the Estate of FreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- McQuarrie v. KuttlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Krause v. ApodacaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.