Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Niccolls

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1912No. L.A. No. 3294PublishedCited by 31 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County setting apart a homestead from the estate of a deceased person, and from an order refusing a new trial. W. R. Guy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mills & O’Farrell, W. J. Mossholder, and Marks P. Moss-holder, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Robert Niccolls, a resident of the county of San Diego, died intestate, leaving property in that county and elsewhere. His heirs were his- widow, Prances Niccolls, and a number of nephews and nieces. Upon the nomination of the widow, W. R. Rogers was appointed administrator of the estate.

Included in the estate was a lot, with a dwelling -thereon, in the city of San Diego. The widow petitioned to have this property set apart to her as a homestead. Objections were filed by various other heirs. After a hearing, the court made its order setting said property apart as a homestead and vesting it…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Kraemer v. KraemerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Burrows v. BurrowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. In re the Estate of LahiffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. In re the Estate of NoahCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. See v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Kuchel v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Estate of ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API