Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Gash v. Pickelsimer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C.J.
The question presented on this appeal is: Did the court below err in denying defendants’ motion to make Blanche Petit Goosen a party to this action? The answer is No.
While the minor plaintiff is not a party to the alleged contract between her mother and the defendants’ testator, she is a beneficiary under it to the extent that the promises contained therein relate to her. And if the defendants’ testator breached the contract, plaintiff would have a cause of action against him for recovery of damages. Redmon v. Roberts, 198 N.C. 161, 150 S.E. 881.
In this respect, in Brown v. Construction Co.,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gorrell v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Boone v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Canestrino v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crosrol Carding Developments, Inc. v. Gunter & Cooke, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Begley v. Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Gash v. PickelsimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Lamica v. GerdesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Haley Ex Rel. Gash v. PickelsimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.