Legal Opinion

Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Gash v. Pickelsimer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 27, 1961No. 34PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C.J.

The question presented on this appeal is: Did the court below err in denying defendants’ motion to make Blanche Petit Goosen a party to this action? The answer is No.

While the minor plaintiff is not a party to the alleged contract between her mother and the defendants’ testator, she is a beneficiary under it to the extent that the promises contained therein relate to her. And if the defendants’ testator breached the contract, plaintiff would have a cause of action against him for recovery of damages. Redmon v. Roberts, 198 N.C. 161, 150 S.E. 881.

In this respect, in Brown v. Construction Co.,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gorrell v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Boone v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Canestrino v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crosrol Carding Developments, Inc. v. Gunter & Cooke, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Begley v. Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Gash v. PickelsimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Lamica v. GerdesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Haley Ex Rel. Gash v. PickelsimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API