Legal Opinion

Crosrol Carding Developments, Inc. v. Gunter & Cooke, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1971No. 7114SC655PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

Plaintiff’s Appeal

Plaintiff contends the court erred in holding that Carding Canada is a party which must be joined under Rule 19 and in ordering plaintiff’s action dismissed with prejudice if Carding Canada is not joined within forty days from the date of the order.

Rule 19(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “ [sjubject to the provisions of Rule 23 [Rule 23 relates to class actions], those who are united in interest must be joined as plaintiffs or defendants. . . .”

Section (b) of Rule 19 provides: “The court may determine any claim before it when it can…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. American Trust Co. v. Catawba Sales & Processing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Gash v. PickelsimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Overton v. TarkingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Simon v. Raleigh City Board of Education Ex Rel. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Howell v. FisherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. White v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. TillettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Woolard v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Whedon v. WhedonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API