Legal Opinion

Honk v. Karlsson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1956No. 5952PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in an equitable action brought by them against defendants Emma Honk, et al., to impress a constructive trust in plaintiffs’ favor upon certain property which had been distributed by a decree of distribution in the matter of the estate of David Swanson (otherwise known as David Svenssen), deceased. The gravamen of said action is that the decree of distribution was procured by means of certain alleged fraudulent acts and conduct on the part of defendant Emma Honk during the course of probate of said estate.

The main point…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In Re McDonnell's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. MacRae v. MacRaeArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Zaremba v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Rice v. TissawArizona Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sauter v. St. Michael's CollegeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. In Re the Estate of MillimanArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Carrillo v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Ivancovich v. MeierArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Norman v. Transamerica Title InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API