Legal Opinion

Jorgenson v. M. ST. P. & SSM RY. CO.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1950No. 35,079, 35,080PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

231 Minn. 121 (1950)

OLGA JORGENSON

v.

MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILWAY COMPANY.

HENRY JORGENSON

v.

SAME.[1]

Nos. 35,079, 35,080.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

May 5, 1950.

James L. Hetland, Ross L. Thorfinnson, and Henry N. Jenson, for appellant.

C.U. Landrum, for respondents.

KNUTSON, JUSTICE.

The two cases above were consolidated for trial and likewise have been consolidated here. The appeals are from orders denying motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdicts or for a new trial after a verdict for plaintiff in each case.

The actions arose out of a collision between one of defendant's…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hollister v. HinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Lawson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Dahlquist v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Franklin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Massmann v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young v. WlazikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Haukom v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Cameron v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API