Legal Opinion

Miller v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 11, 1973No. C.D. 4473; Court No. 71-11-01775PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richardson, Judge:

The merchandise covered by the entries in this action was advanced in value upon appraisement following entry at the port of Los Angeles-Long Beach, Galif. in 1969. It is alleged in the complaint that the appraisement and liquidation of the subject entries are null and void because notice of appraisement was not given *58in accordance with 19 U.S.C.A., section 1501 (section 501, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended).1

The involved entries were made in the name of plaintiff-customs broker Mark Jeffrey (who died prior to trial and was substituted for by Ruth Miller, the executrix of his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Huntley v. WhittierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Orlex Dyes & Chemicals Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. FW Myers & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  2. Atteberry v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API