Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Idaho.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
This is an action of ejectment, in which the plaintiff in error was plaintiff in the court below. It involves an underground segment of a mineral-bearing ledge claimed by the plaintiff in the action to be a portion of the Stemwinder mining-claim, which claim confessedly is, and was at the time of the alleged trespass upon it by the defendants, owned by the plaintiff. The case comes here on the judgment roU. Annexed to the findings of the court, and made a part of them, is a diagram showing the Stemwinder, Emma, and Last Chance mining claims, with the *539vein passing through…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Gwillim v. DonnellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Del Monte Mining & Milling Co. v. Last Chance Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Mining Co. v. TarbetSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Richmond Mining Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Last Chance Min. Co. v. Bunker Hill & S. Mining & Concentrating Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
- Grant v. PilgrimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Anaconda Copper Min. Co. v. Pilot Butte Min. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
- Star Mining Co. v. Federal Mining & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.