Legal Opinion

Grant v. Pilgrim

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1938No. 8463PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by O. M. Grant, David Mutchler, and John Mutchler from a decree against them declaring a trust in favor of appellee Edna G. Pilgrim to certain interests in a mining lode claim, together with a money award against each in an accounting of the proceeds of mining on the claim conducted by them and one George Mutchler. George Mutchler was named as a defendant, but was not served with process, and did not appear in the case as a party, although he appeared as a witness.

Two lode mining claims join with a common northerly and southerly line. One called the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Moore v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Black v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  2. Jakoski v. HollandAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. White v. SmythTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. White v. SmythCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. United States v. MobleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API