Mazzacco v. Purcell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
The determinative question on this appeal is whether the Court of Appeals erred in upholding directed verdict for defendants. This requires two decisions: first, whether defendants were negligent in any respect whatsoever; and second, whether plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law so as to bar any claim for relief.
Taking the evidence in a light most favorable to plaintiff and giving plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom, we conclude it was error to grant directed verdict for the male defendant Harvey Purcell. However, a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Husketh v. Convenient Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Murrell v. HandleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Jones v. Pinehurst, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- LITTLE BY LITTLE v. BellMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Lamm v. Bissette Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Hoots v. PryorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Shelton v. STEELCASE, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.