Legal Opinion

Mazzacco v. Purcell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 8, 1981No. 128PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

The determinative question on this appeal is whether the Court of Appeals erred in upholding directed verdict for defendants. This requires two decisions: first, whether defendants were negligent in any respect whatsoever; and second, whether plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law so as to bar any claim for relief.

Taking the evidence in a light most favorable to plaintiff and giving plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom, we conclude it was error to grant directed verdict for the male defendant Harvey Purcell. However, a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Husketh v. Convenient Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Murrell v. HandleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Jones v. Pinehurst, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. LITTLE BY LITTLE v. BellMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lamm v. Bissette Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Hoots v. PryorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Shelton v. STEELCASE, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API