Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Griffith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1913No. 10846PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Easterday, J., entered September 3, 1912, dismissing an action for divorce, after a hearing on the merits before the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

— This is an action for divorce, based upon alleged acts of cruelty on the part of the defendant. After a *285hearing upon the merits, the court dismissed the action. The plaintiff has appealed.

The appellant testified to acts of cruelty which, if the testimony is true, entitled her to a divorce. These acts were specifically denied by the defendant while upon the witness stand. Both sides are in a measure corroborated. In view of this fact, we do not feel warranted in disturbing the judgment of the trial court. In cases of this character the trial judge has a much better opportunity to arrive at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Willey v. WilleyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Arey v. AreyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Lee v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bounds v. BoundsWashington Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. FitzpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Krieger v. KriegerWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State Ex Rel. Brown v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hufton v. HuftonIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Lehrman v. LehrmanWashington Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API