Legal Opinion

Hufton v. Hufton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District for Ada County. Hon. Charles P. McCarthy, Judge. Action for divorce. Judgment for defendant. ■ “The findings of fact must support the judgment, and if not, the judgment must be reversed.”

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District for Ada County. Hon. Charles P. McCarthy, Judge. Action for divorce. Judgment for defendant. ■ “The findings of fact must support the judgment, and if not, the judgment must be reversed.” (Ponting v. Isaman, 7 Ida. 581, 65 Pac. 434.) . “There is not a substantial conflict in the evidence such as to bring it within the rule that where there is a substantial conflict in the evidence, the finding of the court will not be disturbed.” (Wood v. Broderson, 12 Ida. 190, 85 Pac. 490.) “In equity cases the appellate court will examine the…

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This action was brought by the appellant to obtain a divorce from the defendant. The action was tried by the court and findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment entered in favor of the defendant. The appeal is from the judgment.

The only error assigned is the insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings and judgment. Upon a careful examination of the evidence we find there is a substantial conflict upon all of the material issues made by the pleadings. That being true, under the well-established rule of this court, the findings and judgment must be affirmed. (Friedrich v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weeter Lumber Co. v. FalesIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Griffith v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Blackfoot State Bank v. CrislerIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Coe v. McGranIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Thomason v. Lane-Potter Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davenport v. BurkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bower v. MoormanIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Lus v. PecararoIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Rogers v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Hayton v. ClemansIdaho Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API