Legal Opinion

Arey v. Arey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1900No. 3348PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Jefferson County. — Hon. Jakes G. McOlottoh, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Tbe opinion of tbe court was delivered by

Reavis, J.

Appellant commenced suit to dissolve tbe marriage existing between herself and tbe defendant on tbe ground of tbe non-age of plaintiff at tbe time of entering tbe marriage relation. Tbe allegation was tbat appellant and respondent intermarried in Kitsap county on the 26th day of August, 1897, and tbat thereafter they were, and now are, husband and wife; that at tbe time of tbe marriage appellant was residing with her parents in Jefferson county, and was under tbe age of eighteen years, to-wit, sixteen years; tbat tbe marriage was contracted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kimble v. KimbleWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Eliot v. EliotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Lea v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Methvin v. MethvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Buckley v. BuckleyWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Willits v. WillitsNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Dunphy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API