Legal Opinion

People v. Richardson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1911No. Crim. No. 1683PublishedCited by 51 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense defined by section 274 of the Penal Code as follows: "Every person who provides, supplies, or administers to any pregnant woman, or procures any such woman to take any medicine, drug, or substance, or uses or employs any instrument or other means whatever, with intent thereby to procure the miscarriage of such woman, unless the same is necessary to preserve her life, is punishable,” etc. The indictment charged that he on or about May 10, 1909, did willfully, unlawfully and feloniously provide and supply to a woman, naming her, who was then and there…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Baker v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Chamberlain v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  5. Chatham v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API