Legal Opinion

Willox v. Townsend

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1929No. Docket No. 48, Calendar No. 33,901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Plaintiff was a subcontractor, working for one Scbroeder, who had a contract to construct a building for defendant. This suit is for the balance unpaid on the subcontract, and is grounded upon the claim that defendant orally promised to pay plaintiff the balance in consideration of his completing the work, and that he did so. Plaintiff had verdict of a jury and new trial was denied by the court. Defendant’s contentions are:

1. That the declaration was insufficient to sustain the verdict. Not having challenged the sufficiency of the declaration at the trial by motion, nor objected to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. AustinMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Merkle v. Township of BenningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Stone v. CovellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. M'Hardy v. WadsworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Frankel v. CootsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lintern v. ZentzMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Jackson City Bank & Trust Co. v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. City of Highland Park v. Grant-Mackenzie Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. In Re Petition of CarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Continental Studios, Inc. v. American Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API