Legal Opinion
In Re Petition of Carson
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1961No. Docket 4, Calendar 48,576PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
Appellants, Clara Carson and Carl Werelius, owners of certain lots in Bethany Hills Unit No 2, Berrien county, filed a petition seeking to have vacated, taken up and canceled that portion of Beach road which lies between and adjacent to their respective properties. The lower court held that reasonable objection had been made to the vacation of said road, and denied the petition.
Only appellants’ properties immediately adjoin and are adjacent to that portion of Beach road which they seek to have vacated. The map of the subdivi sion shows the road to be an improved, open road, but, in fact, it…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schlesinger v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Southern Railway Co. v. CombsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Insealator, Inc. v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Burdick v. Harbor Springs Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1976 PA 295, 1976 PA 297Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Comstock v. WheelockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Haynes v. Village of BeulahMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Conlon v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- In Re EngelhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.