Legal Opinion
CORDANCE CORP. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 19, 2010No. Civil Action 06-491-MPTPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
MARY PAT THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On March 10, 2010, Plaintiff Cordance Corporation (“Cordance”) and defendant Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”) jointly filed a letter containing each party’s proposed schedule for resolution of the outstanding issues in this case. 1 In deciding which proposed schedule to adopt, the court was called upon to answer two questions: (1) Prior to Federal Circuit review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(2), does the court have to hold a damage trial or rule on Amazon’s equitable defenses and Cor-dance’s request for equitable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Innogenetics, N v. v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Special Devices, Inc. v. Oea, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- In Re Calmar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Paice LLC v. Toyota Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- IMX, Inc. v. LENDINGTREE, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.