Legal Opinion
Paice LLC v. Toyota Motor Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 18, 2007No. 2006-1610, 2006-1631PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PROST. Opinion concurring in the result filed by Circuit Judge RADER.
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor North America, Inc., and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (collectively, “Toyota”) appeal a judgment by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas that Toyota infringed claims 11 and 39 of U.S. Patent No. 5,343,-970 (“the '970 patent”) owned by Paice LLC (“Paice”) under the doctrine of equivalents. Paice LLC v. Toyota Motor Corp., No. 2:04-CV-211, 2006 WL 2385139 (E.D.Tex. Aug. 16,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Whitserve, LLC v. Computer Packages, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Amado v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.