Legal Opinion

Simmons v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 2007No. WD 66861PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge.

Thomas Simmons appeals the circuit court’s denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 proceedings based on his claim that he was abandoned by post-conviction counsel. Because we determine there was no abandonment, we affirm the judgment.

Background

In 1999, Thomas Simmons was convicted by a jury of four counts of receiving stolen property in violation of section 570.080, RSMo. 1 The court sentenced him as a pri- or and persistent offender to four seven-year prison terms, the concurrent and consecutive nature of which resulted in a total of fourteen years.

The Direct…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. JaynesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  4. State v. OwsleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. State v. GilpinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burston v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Tabor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Clark v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Moore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. ZEIGENBEIN v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API