Legal Opinion

Burston v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 2011No. ED 95228PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA L. COHEN, Judge.

Introduction

Renell Burston (Movant) appeals from the City of St. Louis Circuit Court’s judgment denying his second Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, as successive. Movant contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his second Rule 29.15motion because: (1) his first Rule 29.15motion was dismissed without prejudice and the dismissal was not a final, appealable judgment; (2) Movant was denied his rights to due process because he never received a ruling on the merits of his post-conviction relief claims; and (3) the record is “not clear” whether…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. State v. McMillinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Atchison v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Scott M. Bishop v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. LaVincent Tyrell Robinson, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. White v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Monigan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API