Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 2008No. 28517PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Judge.

We affirm the motion court’s refusal to reopen appellant’s 10-year-old post-conviction (PCR) proceeding.

Procedural Background

Appellant faced first-degree murder and related charges in January 1994, with the state seeking the death penalty. Pursuant to a plea bargain, he pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and armed criminal action, and received consecutive terms of life (with possibility of parole) and 25 years. He then filed a pro se Rule 24.035 motion seeking to set aside his plea and conviction.

Appointed PCR counsel, after a time extension, waived an amended…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Cook v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Volner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API