Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Fowble v. Snoline Express, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2008No. 34151PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUBSTITUTE OPINION.

THE PRIOR OPINION ISSUED JUNE 18, 2008 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN.

W. JONES, Justice.

I. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

Perry “Joe” Fowble (Fowble) is a former truck driver who filed a claim against the Idaho State Special Indemnity Fund (ISIF), alleging that he was totally and permanently disabled due to the combined effects of his previous injuries and his most recent injury. The Referee concluded that Joe Fowble was indeed totally and permanently disabled as an “odd lot” worker, and apportioned liability between his employer’s surety and ISIF. The Industrial Commission upheld the finding…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kinney v. Tupperware Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Arnold v. Splendid BakeryIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Jensen v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Bybee v. State, Indus. Special Indem.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Urry v. Walker & Fox Masonry ContractorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Funes v. AARDEMA DAIRYIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Morris v. Hap Taylor & Sons, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Brown v. Home DepotIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Danti v. DantiIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Aguilar v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API