Deniston v. Burroughs
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtM cHaney, J.
Lot 3 in block 50, of Tannehill & Owens’ Addition to Pine Bluff, is the subject of this controversy. Said lot forfeited and was sold to the State in the name of Addie Silbernagel for the nonpayment in 1937 for the 193-6 taxes. Not being redeemed if was certified to the State in 1939, after the two-year period of redemption had expired, and the State’s title was later confirmed by a proceeding in chancery. On November 4, 1942, the State conveyed said lot to A. D. Chavis who later conveyed to appellant. These deeds constitute appellant’s sole claim of title.
Said lot is located in two paving…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Duncan v. Board of Dir. of Newport Levee Dist.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Baiers v. CammackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Pinkert v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Kaplan v. Street Improvement District No. 359Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hubble v. GrimesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Terry v. StarksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Noe v. SchumanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- United States v. OglesbyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.