Legal Opinion

United States v. Oglesby

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided July 3, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 1374PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.

Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment in this case on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that it is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. To determine this question the Court must consider the entire record and ascertain whether there is a genuine issue of fact remaining.

In its complaint the United States alleged that on July 26, 1945, by warranty deed it purchased from the Waldron Hardware & Mercantile Company certain lands for national forest purposes, including…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Van Brocklin v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. State of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Lee v. Osceola & Little River Road Improvement Dist. No. 1 of Mississippi Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lovey v. Escambia CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  2. Caldwell v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API