Legal Opinion

Baiers v. Cammack

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 1944No. 4-7440PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt; J.

The property involved here is embraced in Street Improvement District No. 508 of Little Bock, Arkansas, and title thereto was acquired by the district October 19, 1938, under foreclosure proceedings for delinquent benefit assessments.

Title thus remained in the district until February 7, 1944, when the property was sold and conveyed to appellee, W. D. Cammack, for a consideration of $1,500.

While the title to this property remained in the district, it was forfeited and sold to the state for the nonpayment of general taxes, assessed against it and claimed to be due for tbe year 1939.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Indiana & Arkansas Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. City of Little Rock v. JeuryensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Cutsinger v. StrangSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  4. Martin v. RoeschSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  5. Central Clay Drainage District v. RabornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Poplar Bluff v. KnoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Hubble v. GrimesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. Deniston v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  4. Bowles v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. Belcher v. WheatSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API