Birck v. County of Walworth
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Patricia Birck (“Birck”) claims, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that Walworth County violated her Fourteenth Amendment rights by denying her application for a conditional use permit that would enable her to land a helicopter on a farm she owns. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment and a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. For reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment will be granted.
I. Facts
Birek’s farm consists of 72 acres, most of it zoned “A-l,” or “Prime Agricultural Land District.” In her…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Louis Desalle v. Kevin W. Wright, Jere E. Fridheim, M.D., Arvid K. Goyal, M.D., Nikki M. ZollarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Magulski v. County of RacineDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995