Legal Opinion

Birck v. County of Walworth

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 25, 1994No. 93-C-0932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

REYNOLDS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Patricia Birck (“Birck”) claims, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that Walworth County violated her Fourteenth Amendment rights by denying her application for a conditional use permit that would enable her to land a helicopter on a farm she owns. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment and a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. For reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment will be granted.

I. Facts

Birek’s farm consists of 72 acres, most of it zoned “A-l,” or “Prime Agricultural Land District.” In her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Louis Desalle v. Kevin W. Wright, Jere E. Fridheim, M.D., Arvid K. Goyal, M.D., Nikki M. ZollarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Magulski v. County of RacineDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API