Legal Opinion

Magulski v. County of Racine

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 16, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 94-C-0514PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

REYNOLDS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendant Racine County adopted a zoning amendment in such manner as to deprive them of equal protection of the laws and due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. Plaintiffs also bring a pendent state claim for violation of Wis.Stat. § 59.97, which sets forth proper procedures for the formation of zoning ordinances. The lawsuit was filed on May 12, 1994.

Racine County filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on June 2,1994, and a motion for summary judgment on November…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Coniston Corporation v. Village of Hoffman EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Standard Bank & Trust Co. v. Village of Orland HillsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API