Magulski v. County of Racine
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendant Racine County adopted a zoning amendment in such manner as to deprive them of equal protection of the laws and due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. Plaintiffs also bring a pendent state claim for violation of Wis.Stat. § 59.97, which sets forth proper procedures for the formation of zoning ordinances. The lawsuit was filed on May 12, 1994.
Racine County filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on June 2,1994, and a motion for summary judgment on November…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Coniston Corporation v. Village of Hoffman EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Standard Bank & Trust Co. v. Village of Orland HillsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995