Legal Opinion

Inman v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 10, 1969No. 1 CA-IC 207PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Judge.

The limited question presented in connection with the review of this industrial claim is whether an employee who is leaving her employer’s premises, with the intent of eating her lunch and thereafter returning to her employment, and falls oil the stairs of the premises was injured “from any accident arising out of and in the course of” her employment. (Quotation from § 8, Art. 18 of the Arizona Constitution, 1 A.R.S.). There was m> defect in the stairs. Our answer to this legal question is that she was not then within the constitutional language and was-not entitled to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Nicholson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. McCampbell v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. City of Phoenix v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Sendejaz v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Samaritan Health Services v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Royall v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API