Legal Opinion

Royall v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 28, 1970No. 1 CA-IC 276PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOFRIO, Presiding Judge.

This case is before the Court by writ of certiorari to review the lawfulness of an award and finding of the Commission for noncompensable claim which found that the injury sustained by the petitioner occurred during the course of her employment, but that the accident did not arise out of her employment.1

The question before the Court is whether the evidence presented to the Commission reasonably supports the award.

The petitioner was employed by the respondent employer when she suffered an accidental injury on Wednesday, April 17, 1968. On the date of the accident…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCampbell v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Garrett v. Gadsden Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Sendejaz v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Inman v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Sacks v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. Pottinger v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. Pottinger v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API