Legal Opinion

Matheson v. McCormac

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 28, 1938No. 14676PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

This cause was heretofore before this Court, and the clarifying statement then made by Justice Bonham makes unnecessary an extended statement now. See Matheson v. McCormac et al., 195 S. E., 122.

In 1932, Alexander J. Matheson, Sr., left this State with a young woman, abandoning his family. His wife thereafter brought an action against him in receivership, served one claimed to be an agent of the absconded husband, and attempted thereby to bring into the jurisdiction of the Court considerable and valuable property belonging to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matheson v. McCormacSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  2. Hunter v. RuffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  3. Bowling v. MangumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. HunterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dibble v. Sumter Ice and Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Long v. Carolina Baking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  3. Professional Bankers Corp. v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Carnie v. CarnieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  5. Stone v. SalleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API