Legal Opinion
City of Winchester v. Winchester Water Works Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided June 20, 1912PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal from Clark Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
William Rogers Clay, Commissioner
Affirming.
Subsection 15 of section 6 of “An Act to amend and reduce into one the several acts relating to the charter and amendments thereto of the town of Winchester,” Vol. 1, p. 350, Acts of 1881-2, reads as follows:
“The Board of Councilmen of said town, and their successors in office, shall have power to contract debts, *178by borrowing money or otherwise, for municipal purposes, to be used within said town, in any sum not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to give their corporate obligations to pay the same, which shall be enforceable…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grant v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Slade v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Monroe Water Works Co. v. City of MonroeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Ludington Water-Supply Co. v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Bartholomew v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- King v. MooreheadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Coerper v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- City of Phoenix v. Landrum & Mills Realty Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Walker v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Carter v. Krueger & SonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.