Legal Opinion

General Electric Co. v. Alexander

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 29, 1921PublishedCited by 14 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the General Electric Company against F. Alexander, N. Fabian and Alpha Laboratories, Inc.

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

The patents and the art here considered were fully discussed in previous opinions of the Circuit Court of Appeals and of this court. General Electric Co. v. Laco-Philips, 233 Fed. 96, 147 C. C. A. 166, affirmed 233 Fed. 96, 147 C. C. A. 166. General Flee. Co. v. Nitro-Tungsten Lamp Co. (D. C.) 261 Fed. 606, affirmed (C. C. A.) 266 Fed. 994.

The Just and Hanaman patent is now attacked upon the ground (a) of invalidity and (b) non-infringement. The Langmuir patent is attacked upon the ground of invalidity.

*291The bulk of the record is quite disproportionate to the simplicity of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hoyt v. HorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. General Electric Co. v. Laco-Philips Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  4. General Electric Co. v. Hoskins Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
  5. General Electric Co. v. Nitro Tungsten Lamp Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  2. General Electric Co. v. Minneapolis Electric Lamp Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1924
  3. General Electric Co. v. P. R. Mallory & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923
  4. A. B. Dick Co. v. BarnettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
  5. General Electric Co. v. P. R. Mallory & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API