Starkweather v. Sundstrom
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Charles Sundstrom. and another, from "an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Broome Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Broomé on the 31st day of January, 1906, denying the defendants’ motion for a r.etaxation of costs-. ,
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, J.:
The costs were taxed upon a judgment of the Appellate Division affirming a judgment of the court below.- Amongthe items of costs was seventy-eight dollars for procuring stenographer’s minutes to enable the plaintiff to" propose amendments.to the defendants’ proposed case. This item was objected to before the taxing officer “ on the ground that said item is illegal and; improper and cannot be properly retaxed or taxed as a disbursement, because the. defendants, were never requested to.lend their copy of the minutes to the plaintiff in order to prepare" amendments.” By reason of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ridabock v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by5 opinions
- Long Island Contracting & Supply Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Adams Laundry Machinery Co. v. PrunierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Pringle v. DeanNew York Supreme Court · 1911
- Navara v. M. Witmark & SonsNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Shapiro v. PuniaNew York Supreme Court · 1956