Legal Opinion

Matter of Application of Winston

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1911No. Crim. No. 1682PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPLICATION for a writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Sheriff of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Chief Justice.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

This is a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus. The prisoner is held by the sheriff of Alameda County by virtue of a commitment issued by a justices’ court after a judgment of conviction, which has been affirmed on appeal by the superior court. The imprisonment is alleged to be unlawful for the sole reason that the complaint upon which the prosecution was founded was insufficient to confer jurisdiction on the justices’ court. So much of the complaint as is material here reads as follows:

“Boland Webb being duly sworn, deposes and says, that H. B. Winston did, in the city of Berkeley, county of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. PeralesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. People v. SaffellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. State v. GreeneIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Robberson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. In Re MeisnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API