Legal Opinion
In Re Meisner
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 7, 1939No. Crim. 375PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Petitioner seeks his release from the custody of the sheriff of Fresno County by a writ of habeas corpus, contending that on the 5th day of November, 1938, he was erroneously committed by the judge of the City Court of the City of Coalinga, in Fresno County.
Petitioner sets forth two grounds by which he seeks his release: (1) Failure of the complaint to state in the charging part thereof that the offense was committed within the corporate limits of the city of Coalinga and (2) that the complaint fails to state a public offense in that it does not specifically allege that the property stolen…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Ex parte KearnyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Ex Parte GreenallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- In Re KasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Antilla v. Justice's Court of Big River Twp.California Supreme Court · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Valentín Cruz v. Torres MarreroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
- Burns v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- State v. ClarkWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. AndrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Castillo v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.