Legal Opinion

People v. Webber

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1902No. Crim. No. 894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Defendant was accused by the district attorney of Solano County of the crime of burglary, committed as follows: “The said Edward Webber on the twenty-first day of January, A. D. 1891, at and in the state of California, . . . did unlawfully, feloniously, and burglariously enter a certain railroad car and train, to wit: a railroad car and train owned and operated by the Southern Pacific Company (a corporation), said railroad car and train, at the time aforesaid, being in the prosecution of its trip, and Solano County, in said state of California, at said time, being a county through…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MalleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. People v. MelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. State v. StutchesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. In Re MyrtleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API