Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Milford Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 26, 1948PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

This action is before us upon an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff, who had owned certain land the first mortgage upon which had been foreclosed, claims that she is entitled to relief, in the nature of a redemption of the premises, against an attaching creditor, a party to the foreclosure, and against one to whom he had assigned his interest and who had redeemed the property from the mortgage.

As regards this issue, the material facts are not disputed. The plaintiff owned certain real estate in West Haven which was subject to a mortgage to the defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MoscaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Palverari v. FintaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. Jarvis v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  4. Hoey v. Investors' Mortgage & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Jenkins v. ReichertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Grievance Committee v. DaceySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. Morrone v. JoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. Pitt v. KentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  5. Small Business Investment Co. v. CavalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API