Legal Opinion
Hoey v. Investors' Mortgage & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 6, 1934PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The complaint alleged circumstances pertaining to the rendition of a judgment of foreclosure obtained by the present defendant against the plaintiff on April 22d, 1932, and facts subsequent thereto, upon which it was claimed, by the prayers for relief, that the judgment be set aside, the certificate of foreclosure be canceled and title to the mortgaged premises be revested in plaintiff subject to existing mortgages; also that the defendant be enjoined from conveying, transferring or mortgaging the premises and from commencing any proceeding to compel the plaintiff to vacate the premises;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Folwell v. HowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Carrington v. HolabirdSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
- Jarvis v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Osborn v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848
- Dante v. DanteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Black v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Palverari v. FintaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- City Sav. Bk of Bridgeport v. MikoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.