Legal Opinion

People v. Tunstall

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1984PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jasen, J.

The critical issue presented is whether a pretrial hearing must be held to determine whether a defendant’s ability to cross-examine a prosecution witness has been unduly impaired as a result of that witness’s having been hypnotized in an effort to learn additional details of the crime even though the hypnotic process did not lead to the discovery of any significant new facts and the witness’s testimony at trial mirrored statements which she had made prior to being hypnotized.

In the early morning hours of May 4,1979, a rape victim and her boyfriend were talking in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. People v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. ConaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. NickelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. People v. WilderNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. People v. HultsNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. EdmonsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. Michael M.New York Supreme Court · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API