Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified and the case remitted for a new suppression hearing.

A blind Judge should not preside at a hearing where, as in this case, because of an inability to see, the Judge is unable to evaluate a critical exhibit — a photograph of the contested lineup — without calling upon another person to describe it to him. Under these circumstances the Judge should have recused himself, as the defendant requested, and the denial of the motion constituted an abuse of discretion as a matter of law.

If the defendant’s motion to…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. TunstallNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. HayesColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. CaldwellCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1993
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API