Legal Opinion
United States v. James A. Winstead
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 2, 1996No. 94-3025PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS.
HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge:
On November 22,1993, a jury found appellant James Winstead guilty of ten counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1988), and six counts of making false statements to a federal agency, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (1988). Winstead contends that these convictions must be reversed because the District Court improperly questioned two witnesses. Winstead also asserts that he was deprived of a jury verdict on the false statement charges because the jury was improperly instructed as to the requisite…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. George Vernon HansenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Cordell Spencer, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Wilbert B. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- United States v. George B. Godwin, Jr., United States of America v. Willa L. Curry-Robinson,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Frank AnticoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- United States v. Robert J. Amico, Richard N. AmicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.