United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Cordell Spencer, Appellant/cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:
The most serious issue presented in this case is whether, as the district court ruled, the career offender provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines are unconstitutional as applied to the defendant, Cordell Spencer. Spencer was convicted, after a jury trial, of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base (21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(B)(iii)), and possession with intent to distribute a detectable amount of heroin (21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C)). Refusing to follow the Sentencing Guidelines, which…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- United States v. PiperCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Wilson, Ralph T.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Motorists Mutual Insurance Co. v. GlassKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- United States v. James CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.