Legal Opinion

Dudeck v. Watson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1910No. Docket No. 150PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Shiawassee; Miner, J. John Dudeck presented a claim against the estate of Emma Reidy, deceased, for services rendered. The claim was allowed in the probate court, and John A. Watson, administrator, appealed to the circuit court. A judgment for claimant is reviewed by contestant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAiway, J.

The claim in dispute in this case is for services rendered by claimant and his wife for Mrs. Reidy, amounting to $730, $355 of which is for services by plaintiff’s wife before the death of Mr. Reidy, and the balance, $375, for services by claimant and his wife for Mrs. Reidy after Mr. Reidy’s death. The larger part of the charges is for the claimed services of claimant’s wife in the nature of domestic services and nursing; the latter rendered both to Mr. and Mrs. Reidy.

Michael Reidy and his wife, Emma, owned and occupied a two-story brick building in the village of Corunna. The ground floor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Finn v. Sowders' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Gustafson v. EgerMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Buck v. Estate of HaynesMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Locklund v. Burman's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beaupre v. HolzbaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Schultz v. Pomplon's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Caswell v. Smith's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Pomeroy v. EverettMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API