Gustafson v. Eger
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Marquette; Stone, J. Assumpsit by Frank Gustafson, administrator, with the will annexed, of the estate of Augusta D. Gustafson, deceased, against Mary A. Eger, upon a promissory note. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Hooker, O. J.
The defendant and her mother were tenants in common of a stock of jewelry. The defendant purchased her mother’s interest, giving four notes in payment. Three of the notes were paid, and this action was brought' upon the last to fall due. No controversy arises over the giving of the note. The defense made is by way of payment and set-off. After purchasing the property, the defendant conducted a jewelry business; her husband being manager and agent for her in the conduct of the business. Upon the trial he was permitted to testify that he sold to the mother articles of jewelry from…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Great Camp Knights of the Maccabees v. SavageMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Longe v. KinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- McCain v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Dudeck v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Mutual Ben. Life Ins. Co. of New Jersey v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1925