Buck v. Estate of Haynes
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clinton. (Smith, J.) Claim filed against estate of deceased person, and allowed in part in probate and circuit courts. Claimant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Claimant purchased an account against Lucy *398Haynes, deceased, from Dr. Geo. E. Bliss, which was filed in the probate court as a claim against her estate, May 3, 1888.
The account, as claimed, amounted to $97.75, and was for the services of Dr. Bliss as a physician during the sickness of Mrs. Haynes and her husband.
The claim was allowed at $4.50 in probate court, and claimant appealed to the circuit court, where judgment was entered in his favor for $5.75. He now brings the case to this Court by writ of error.
On the trial Dr. Bliss, the assignor of the account, was produced as a witness by the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Cooper Grocery Co. v. NeblettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Dudeck v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Schultz v. Pomplon's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Thomas v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1900