Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Caswell v. Smith's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1933No. Docket No. 106, Calendar No. 37,003Published

1Concurrence

I concur with Mr. Justice WIEST. A wife, under the so-called "married women's act (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13057 et seq.), " may, with the consent of her husband, engage in business on her own account (Tillman v. Shackleton, 15 Mich. 447 [93 Am. Dec. 198]; West v. Laraway, 28 Mich. 464), and she may sue and collect for personal services performed by her; and, in case such services were performed for a person who dies before the settlement of her claim, she may present in her own name a claim against the estate of such deceased person, to get pay for the services performed, independent of any…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. West v. LarawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Tillman v. ShackletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Bolthouse v. De SpelderMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Penny v. CroulMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Ashley v. Smith's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API